Having drafted a paper on the first record of L. grotei in West Africa, I had the opportunity to review the relevant pages of the IRD guide to lizards in the region* and subsequently to correspond with the senior author.
It appears that L. conraui is highly variable in its native West Africa and is best distinguished from its cogener L. fischeri on the basis of the number of rows of subcaudal scales (one in L. conraui, two in L. fischeri). On the basis of the images presented in the book, I was inclined towards the possibility that the animals seen could even have been L. fischeri. However, J-F. Trape has indicated that the animals photographed seem to be within the range of variation known for L. conraui.
So, no L. grotei in Benin after all.
I wonder what the implications of natural variability of Lygodactylus in the wild are for the pet trade. As a sometime birder and lepidopterist, I find it very frustrating when animals cannot be identified on sight and need to be in the hand for positive identification!
Thank you for your interest and help!
Guy
*Trape, J.-F., Trape, S. & Chirio, L. (2012) Lézards, Crocodiles et Tortues d’Afrique Occidentale et du Sahara. IRD Éditions, Montpellier, France.
|